Nisab Zakat Fitrah Dalam Pembelajaran Perbandingan Senilai

  • Yudi Yunika Putra STKIP Muhammadiyah Bangka Belitung
  • Adi Saputra STKIP Muhammadiyah Bangka Belitung
Keywords: Worth Comparison; Zakat Fitrah; Design Research.

Abstract

Mathematical Comparison theory is very important because students are often faced by comparative case in their daily life. Besides, the theory as well as implementation of zakat fitrah must be understood by moslems. Therefore, the the merging of these two concepts is a breakthrough in producing mathematics learning material. The purpose of this study was to produce the learning path in Mathematical comparison learning material by merging nisab theory of zakat fitrahThe method used in this study was design research that consisted of three steps namely introductory design (preparing for the experiment or preliminary design), try out (the design experiment), and retrospective analysis. Data were analyzed descriptively and retrospectively with HLT as the reference or guidance. The subjects in this study were the second semester students of the STKIP Muhamamdiyah Bangka Belitung Elementary School Teacher Education Study Program, with total number of 28 students. The criteria of selective the sample was that the the students were studying a basic mathematics concept course with Mathematical comparison as one of the materials. In this study, students were able to model their respective completion strategies and in accordance with the concept of worth comparison. HLT was designed to bring out students’ creativity in solving problems.

References

Al-Ghozi, Muḥammad ibn Qasim. (2003). Fatḥ al-qarib al-mujib. Beirut: Dar alKutub al-Islamiyyat.

Al-Qur’an dan terjemahan. (2008). Departemen Agama RI. Bandung: CV Diponegoro.Atabik, A. (2016). Manajemen pengelolaan zakat yang efektif di era kontemporer.ZISWAF:Jurnal Zakat dan Wakaf,2(1), 40-62.

Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. InEducational design research(pp. 29-63). London: Routledge.

Hamidah, D., Putri, R. I. I., & Somakim, S. (2018). Eksplorasi pemahaman siswa pada materi perbandingan senilai menggunakan konteks ceritadi SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM), 1(1), 1-10.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v1n1.p1-10

Hidayatulloh, H. (2017). Relasi ilmu pengetahuan dan agama.Proceedings of the ICECRS,1(1).UUM-UMSIDA, 25-27 October 2016 Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.627

Hussin, M., Yahya, M., Muhammad, F., Ahmad, R., & Ali, M. (2013). Kepatuhan membayar zakat: Analisis kutipan dan ketirisan zakat fitrah di Selangor.Jurnal Syariah,21(2), 191-206.Diambil dari: http://ir.upsi.edu.my/id/eprint/2066

Lanya, H. (2016). Pemahaman konsep perbandingan siswa SMP berkemampuan matematika rendah.Sigma,2(1), 19-22.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.0324/sigma.v2i1.72

Maarif, S. (2015). Integrasi matematika dan Islam dalam pembelajaran matematika.Infinity Journal,4(2), 223-236. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v4i2.p223-236.

Ningsih, P. R. (2012). Penerapan metode realistic mathematics education (RME) pada pokok bahasan perbandingan senilai dan berbalik nilai di Kelas VII E SMP Ipiems Surabaya.Gamatika,3(2).177-184.

Prahmana,R.C.I.,(2017). Design Research. Depok : Rajawali Pers.

Putra, Y. Y., & Saputra, A. (2018). The applying of hypothetical learning trajectory (HLT) on comparison material using nisab zakat theory toward the student's learning outcomes.Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika,9(2), 135-146.DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v9i2.2950

Putra, Y.Y.,Zulkardi.,& Hartono, Y. (2016). Pengembangan soal matematika model pisamenggunakan konteks lampung. Jurnal Kreano, 7(1): 10-16.DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7444

Raharjanti, M., Nusantara, T., & Mulyati, S. (2016). Kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan perbandingan senilai dan berbalik nilai.Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya (KNPMP) I 2016. 12 Maret 2016. 312-319. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Rahmawati, R., Somakim, S., & Susanti, E. (2016). Kertas berpetak pada pembelajaran perbandingan senilai.Jurnal Elemen,2(2), 116-126.

Retnadi, E., & Setia, A. (2013). Pengembangan aplikasi perhitungan zakat berbasis android.Jurnal Algoritma, 10(2), 139-149.https://doi.org/10.33364/algoritma/v.10-2.139

Ristekdikti. (2015). Kerangka kualifikasi nasional indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia.

Saputri, I., Susanti, E., & Aisyah, N. (2017). Kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa menggunakan pendekatan metaphorical thinking pada materi perbandingan kelas VIII di SMP N 1 Indralaya Utara.Jurnal Elemen,3(1), 15-24.

Setiawan, A.R. (2018). Mathematnic: Catatan pengalaman memandu pembelajaran matematika. Alobatnic Research Society (ARS),1-7 DOI: http://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/fx7uw

Sumarto, S. N., Van Galen, F., Zulkardi, H., & Darmawijoyo, D. (2014). Proportional reasoning: how do the 4th graders use their intuitive understanding?.International Education Studies,7(1), 69-80.

Utari, R. S., Putri, R. I. I., & Hartono, Y. (2015). Konteks kebudayaan palembang untuk mendukung kemampuan bernalar siswa smp pada materi perbandingan.Jurnal Didaktik Matematika,2(2), 27-37.

Published
2020-01-24